| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1ZardnaarAug 31, 2014 18:30:36 | The default human has come under some criticism for being weak and/or boring. Boring I an understand and one can take 12,12,12,14,14,16 after racial mods if the DM allows point buy. Humans can start with multiple 18's though although technically anyone can it is easier for humans. |
| #22ChlorobutanalAug 31, 2014 18:36:15 | So, basically you think default humans are powerful because you manipulate character generation by rolling stats and "suiciding" poorly rolled characters?
By that logic, any nonhuman (or variant human) is powerful because they can start with 20s. |
| #3Jell_MooAug 31, 2014 18:40:57 | I can also roll 6 seperate 18s. It's unlikely, but random numbers are random.
There's a reason why the default array is used in terms of balance discusions. I get what you're saying, but it just seems like a strange way of looking at it.
(Full disclosure: I *hate* rolling for stats. I've seen too many games where one person rolls mediocre and another rolls amazingly and the balance between characters is just shot). |
| #4Captain_KoboldAug 31, 2014 18:53:31 |
|
| #5ZardnaarAug 31, 2014 19:08:01 |
|
| (Reply to #5)2Chlorobutanal |
|
| #7ZardnaarAug 31, 2014 19:29:49 |
|
| #8NoonAug 31, 2014 19:32:15 |
|
| (Reply to #7)2Chlorobutanal |
|
| #10QmarkAug 31, 2014 19:41:39 | Yeah... I'm gonna file this under "yeah, so?" |
| #11ZardnaarAug 31, 2014 19:42:30 |
|
| #12Captain_KoboldAug 31, 2014 19:51:12 |
|
| #13ZardnaarAug 31, 2014 20:03:36 |
|
| #14frothsofAug 31, 2014 20:23:45 | Have you been drinking lighter fluid again Zardnaar? |
| #15setiAug 31, 2014 20:32:52 | I just keep rolling 4d6 until I roll an 18, then roll 5 more times.
Seriously, I do prefer rolling, as point buy/array is...boring to me. I suppose I'd use that at a LGS or Con, though. At home, we roll together, and just don't use stats until they are balanced (ie: no one has a bunch of 6-7 stats, or a bunch of 17-18 stats.) |
| #16NoonAug 31, 2014 21:10:53 |
|
| #17ZardnaarSep 01, 2014 0:37:00 |
|
| #18CCSSep 01, 2014 7:29:15 |
|
| #19Plaguescarred1Sep 01, 2014 8:49:27 |
|
| #20TiaNadiezjaSep 01, 2014 8:52:32 | Dude, you're reaching. |
| #21autolycusSep 01, 2014 9:43:53 |
|
| #22JC999Sep 01, 2014 10:46:29 | So would you be willing to agree that RAW the DM is not allowed to say you can't play a dragonborn or a tiefling? |
| (Reply to #22)seti |
|
| #24IllithidbixSep 01, 2014 14:14:20 | I must say character optimisation that uses suiciding rubbish characters is a novel one. It's certainly THE LONG GAME approach to optimisation.
Is it something you encounter often? |
| #25ZardnaarSep 01, 2014 14:21:23 |
|
| #26HitdiceSep 01, 2014 14:23:44 |
|
| #27ZardnaarSep 01, 2014 14:42:59 |
|
| #28Eric888Sep 01, 2014 19:50:43 | I love the idea of using dice rolling to generate stats and then complain that it can make unbalanced characters. Its like complaining that chocolate makes you fat.
Point Buy makes balanced characters that are a little cookie cutter.
Dice rolling can easily produce wildly unbalanced characters, but they are all unique slowflakes.
What is a greater sin to you as a DM: Cookie Cutter characters, or Broken characters? You are going to get one of those, so pick one and live with the consequences. But don't come to a forum and complain that dice rolls made a broken character and the system needs to be fixed. |
| #29Delazar78Sep 02, 2014 6:08:10 | Zard, what happened??? Your threads on Dragonsfoot were so interesting, while the last 3 - 4 I saw here are just... off...
Has your account been hacked? Come back! |
| #30ZardnaarSep 02, 2014 6:12:04 |
|