Humans RAW Can Start With multiple 18's

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

Zardnaar

Aug 31, 2014 18:30:36

The default human has come under some criticism for being weak and/or boring. Boring I an understand and one can take 12,12,12,14,14,16 after racial mods if the DM allows point buy. Humans can start with multiple 18's though although technically anyone can it is easier for humans.

However RAW it seems you can roll 4d6 or use the default stat array. The DM can choose to allow point buy. This makes the human more powerful IMHO as the +1 to everything mean more than the default stat array which only has a 13 and a 15 to really benefit the human. AFAIK it seems on average around 3 of your scores may be an odd number via rolling dice. Feats and the variant human are also optional so if you have your heart set on playing as a human take the chance and roll dice. If you roll low change your mind and play a non human with the stat array or suicide your character at level 1. Experiment a little.
My stats rolled right now 4d6 drop the lowest. Ironman no dice fudging.

11
18
9
7
8
14

12,14,18 as your best 3 stats, 8,9, 10 as your lowest. I would keep this or you could pick another race I suppose if you want a 20.

Character 2
14
7
12
13
13
13

8,15,13,14,14,14 for stas a little odd but its not to awful although you will not get a 16.

Character 3.
13
10
11
14
16
10

14, 11, 12 15, 17,11 as scores, offers an 18 and a 16 at level 4. I would use this

Character 4.

15
10
10
5
11
11

I would like to introduce you to Lemming the fighter. He has chronic depression problems and likes to be abused by Hobgoblins.

Character 5
15
13
11
16
9
15

Jackpot. 16,14,12,17,10,16

And the best part is RAW the DM can't chose to not let you roll. I am the DM in my game and I have no issue with letting PCs roll the dice if they want although for our 1st game they all chose the default array. I think rolling also slightly favours the default human as well. I may restrict races, classes feats and multiclassing but you can roll if you want.

 

#2

2Chlorobutanal

Aug 31, 2014 18:36:15

So, basically you think default humans are powerful because you manipulate character generation by rolling stats and "suiciding" poorly rolled characters?

 

By that logic, any nonhuman (or variant human) is powerful because they can start with 20s.

#3

Jell_Moo

Aug 31, 2014 18:40:57

I can also roll 6 seperate 18s. It's unlikely, but random numbers are random.

 

There's a reason why the default array is used in terms of balance discusions. I get what you're saying, but it just seems like a strange way of looking at it.

 

(Full disclosure: I *hate* rolling for stats. I've seen too many games where one person rolls mediocre and another rolls amazingly and the balance between characters is just shot).

#4

Captain_Kobold

Aug 31, 2014 18:53:31

Zardnaar wrote:
#5

Zardnaar

Aug 31, 2014 19:08:01

Captain_Kobold wrote:
(Reply to #5)

2Chlorobutanal

Zardnaar wrote:
#7

Zardnaar

Aug 31, 2014 19:29:49

2Chlorobutanal wrote:
#8

Noon

Aug 31, 2014 19:32:15

Zardnaar wrote:
(Reply to #7)

2Chlorobutanal

Zardnaar wrote:
#10

Qmark

Aug 31, 2014 19:41:39

Yeah... I'm gonna file this under "yeah, so?"

#11

Zardnaar

Aug 31, 2014 19:42:30

2Chlorobutanal wrote:
#12

Captain_Kobold

Aug 31, 2014 19:51:12

Zardnaar wrote:
#13

Zardnaar

Aug 31, 2014 20:03:36

Captain_Kobold wrote:
#14

frothsof

Aug 31, 2014 20:23:45
Have you been drinking lighter fluid again Zardnaar?
#15

seti

Aug 31, 2014 20:32:52

I just keep rolling 4d6 until I roll an 18, then roll 5 more times.

 

 

Seriously, I do prefer rolling, as point buy/array is...boring to me. I suppose I'd use that at a LGS or Con, though. At home, we roll together, and just don't use stats until they are balanced (ie: no one has a bunch of 6-7 stats, or a bunch of 17-18 stats.)

#16

Noon

Aug 31, 2014 21:10:53

frothsof wrote:
#17

Zardnaar

Sep 01, 2014 0:37:00

frothsof wrote:
#18

CCS

Sep 01, 2014 7:29:15
Zardnaar wrote:
#19

Plaguescarred1

Sep 01, 2014 8:49:27

Zardnaar wrote:
#20

TiaNadiezja

Sep 01, 2014 8:52:32

Dude, you're reaching.

#21

autolycus

Sep 01, 2014 9:43:53

Zardnaar wrote:
#22

JC999

Sep 01, 2014 10:46:29

So would you be willing to agree that RAW the DM is not allowed to say you can't play a dragonborn or a tiefling?

(Reply to #22)

seti

JC999 wrote:
#24

Illithidbix

Sep 01, 2014 14:14:20

I must say character optimisation that uses suiciding rubbish characters is a novel one.

It's certainly THE LONG GAME approach to optimisation.

 

Is it something you encounter often?

#25

Zardnaar

Sep 01, 2014 14:21:23

Illithidbix wrote:
#26

Hitdice

Sep 01, 2014 14:23:44

Illithidbix wrote:
#27

Zardnaar

Sep 01, 2014 14:42:59

JC999 wrote:
#28

Eric888

Sep 01, 2014 19:50:43

I love the idea of using dice rolling to generate stats and then complain that it can make unbalanced characters. Its like complaining that chocolate makes you fat.

 

Point Buy makes balanced characters that are a little cookie cutter.

 

Dice rolling can easily produce wildly unbalanced characters, but they are all unique slowflakes.

 

What is a greater sin to you as a DM: Cookie Cutter characters, or Broken characters? You are going to get one of those, so pick one and live with the consequences. But don't come to a forum and complain that dice rolls made a broken character and the system needs to be fixed. 

#29

Delazar78

Sep 02, 2014 6:08:10

Zard, what happened??? Your threads on Dragonsfoot were so interesting, while the last 3 - 4 I saw here are just... off...

 

Has your account been hacked? Come back!

#30

Zardnaar

Sep 02, 2014 6:12:04

Delazar78 wrote: