| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1frothsofSep 16, 2014 15:00:18 | http://legrumph.org/VP/D%26D5-CharacterSheetLG.pdf
|
| #2JaxairSep 16, 2014 16:20:27 | I like that one, nice find.
|
| #3GriffordSep 16, 2014 17:09:10 | I always wonder if anyone ever, EVER uses those "death saves" check boxes. It's only been 1 round, have you already forgotten how close your character is to dying? |
| (Reply to #3)arderkrag |
|
| #5basilburSep 16, 2014 17:39:55 | Putting the skills under each Ability is brilliant. The only thing I would add is a label for spell attack modifier and spell DC. |
| #6ren1999Sep 16, 2014 18:16:05 | This is a sweet, sweet character sheet.
kira3696.tripod.com |
| #7souldoubtSep 16, 2014 18:47:47 | Not form fillable. Would not use.
Looks neat though. |
| #8KalaniSep 16, 2014 18:55:36 | I have the opposite opinion. It is very busy, and the artwork is such that it is distracting and detracts from the relevant information you are looking for. It also has very little space for class features, equipment, etc.
I do enjoy visually appealing character sheets, however this is not one of them IMO, nor do I find its layout and font choices very practical. YMMV
|
| #9AkeishaSep 16, 2014 19:34:07 | Well, it does look pretty with the artwork, but it is definitely short on space to record much information. |
| #10grendel111111Sep 16, 2014 21:54:21 | Has a very fighting fantasy character sheet to it. For me it is too busy, and finding infomation would slow down. I do like that the list the different armour and weapons and you can select the check box to show what you are skilled with. |
| #11Joe_the_RatSep 17, 2014 5:46:44 | Like the aesthetics, would want to rejigger the space allotted for everything. |
| #12spelleySep 17, 2014 5:55:27 | Honestly, to make it less "busy" the easiest thing to do would be to decrease the weight of the lines and maybe make it off-black instead of black to soften it up a bit. |
| #13Thank_DogSep 17, 2014 6:00:25 | That is, by far, the worst character sheet I've ever seen.
Oh wait, no, I forgot. The winner of the playtest design was still worse than that. |
| #14joeburgosSep 17, 2014 6:01:02 | very, very nice. I really like it. Any chance of getting a spell casting/equiptment sections? |
| #15VacantPsalmSep 17, 2014 12:12:31 | I like it a lot better than the sheets that look like tax forums. I prefer big main numbers over room for lots of info. (Although, I prefer one small card that have even less info.) If I need to track a bunch of stuff (like equipment or spells) give me blank, lined paper that is seperate from my main sheet. I have never been happy with that stuff on my character sheet; same with current HP.
Only problem, IMO, is the Attacking + Spellcasting section. I would prefer to lose the equipment section and give that a lot more room. Stuff is going to be spilling onto the back of the sheet anyways, might as well have it start there. |
| #16SynjinSep 17, 2014 13:55:08 | I like to see how my scores get to their totals. I want to know how much of my score is Proficiency, Ability Mod, and Expertise (if applicable), so I started tweaking my 3x sheet. It's a work in progress, and I'm sure tons more will change along the way.
|
| #17Robert_Mac_HeadSep 18, 2014 0:07:02 | After reviewing/reading the new PHB (5th E), I'm really curious about the upcoming MM. Although I eventually abandoned 4E, I liked some of their innovations. (1) Minions -- These pesky, numerous masses of sword and arrow fodder were a great idea, and I'd like to see similar versions in the new edition. Otherwise, I'll have to house rule my own. (2) Mobs -- I liked how these were represented in 4E and hope the MM or DMG finds a way to incorporate crowds of NPCs/monsters into the new edition. |
| #18VanRicterSep 18, 2014 6:59:28 | My group loves the look of this character sheet. I hope the designer makes a spell sheet to accompany. |
| (Reply to #6)Elfcrusher |
|