| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1thors_breakfastJun 15, 2015 14:31:30 | So I recently purchased the core rule books for D&D 5e, and I wanted to know if there were plans to release "sequels" to the rule books, like they did in 4e with the MM2, PHB 2&3, and DMG2? |
| #2pukunuiJun 15, 2015 14:56:43 | WotC has said repeatedly that they don't want to do that anymore, so it's unlikely we'll see anything like a PHB 2 or whatever. An MM 2 would be more likely, though, but still not guaranteed. |
| #3thors_breakfastJun 15, 2015 15:10:39 |
|
| #4pukunuiJun 15, 2015 15:40:37 |
|
| #5MechaPilotJun 15, 2015 15:43:45 |
|
| #6pukunuiJun 15, 2015 15:48:18 |
|
| #7MechaPilotJun 15, 2015 15:52:08 |
|
| (Reply to #4)crimfan07 |
|
| (Reply to #7)crimfan07 |
|
| #10lawrencehoyJun 15, 2015 21:07:41 |
|
| #11joeburgosJun 17, 2015 7:09:55 |
|
| #12Ralif_RedhammerJun 17, 2015 7:46:44 | I’m glad to hear they’ll probably not be going that route again. Hopefully that will limit rules bloat. I think all DMs are in agreement that more monsters would be a good thing, though.
I wasn’t a fan of the multiple PHBs of 4e, but dang it if the DMG2 wasn’t a really wonderful book filled with advice and inspiration. |
| #13shintashiJun 17, 2015 9:40:17 | I liked the Skills & Powers and Unearthed Arcana Structure. monstrous manual appendix for planescape were a special treat, among my most prized monster manuals. When someone asks for Cheese & Powers or Smells & Magic, I know immediately what kind of material is being referenced. When we dig into an Unearthed Arcana, we immediately expect something above par, probably broken, and requiring DM approval. That's fine. I dont like to Tech it all out so it becomes abbreviations of PHB-3.2 or DMG-17 or whatever. That would drive me batty. |