| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1LawolfAug 04, 2014 18:42:26 | Swashbuckle! Feat
-Tumble, leap, or squeeze through an enemies’ spaces without provoking opportunity attacks. -Slam into an enemy to knock it prone and/or push it up to 10 feet away from you. -Other comparable effects.
Note: Anyone is able to attempt similar stunts as improvised actions, but you are able to perform them as a bonus action and without needing to succeed at ability checks or contests (provided you spend the inspiration to perform such a stunt). |
| #2DaganevAug 05, 2014 4:03:22 | I like this, but why the cost of inspiration? Seems a bit much since you are giving up a +2 for this, and rogues basically get this ability with cunning action. |
| #3Emerikol.Aug 05, 2014 8:20:16 | I think if inspiration is semi-rare then this feat works. If it is common place then I would have my doubts.
It looks pretty powerful Daganev because of the auto success so the inspiration cost makes sense. |
| #4LawolfAug 05, 2014 8:43:19 |
|
| #5tallric_kruushAug 05, 2014 9:34:29 | Pretty cool idea. Thanks for sharing! |
| #6ClockworkNecktieAug 05, 2014 9:43:54 | I think using inspiration might be a bad idea here, because it's both completely reliant on the DM and, if the DM is playing by the book, it ties your combat performance to your roleplaying, which is a bit weird.
You could just make it once per short rest, of course. But looking through the list, a lot of this stuff duplicates either Cunning Action or (potential) Battlemaster maneuvers, which might take away from those classes. (Why play a fighter or rogue when a ranger with this feat can do the best of both?)
I wonder if you could simplify the feat to something like this:
Swashbuckle!: When you use your action in combat to make a Strength or Dexterity check, such as to climb, jump, swing from a chandelier, grapple, trip, or shove an opponent, you can make a single melee attack as a bonus action.
That might work to encourage more stunts just by reducing the opportunity cost of missing an attack action. (Not sure if the wording is quite right, though.) |
| #7ChrisCarlsonAug 05, 2014 10:44:49 |
|