| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zagora_01Aug 09, 2014 18:00:35 |
After reading the multiclassing rules, i want to make sure I got it right. It seams the warlock's cater level doesn't go up with the combination of the two classes like it does for the ohters.
I hope I'm reading something wrong |
| #2masterfat78Aug 09, 2014 18:05:39 | They do kinda get screwed that way, but the class itself makes up for that by being versatyle. |
| #3demon_idolAug 09, 2014 18:13:47 | But the real reason that a warlock gets screwed multiclassing is because warlocks are so incredibly badass that a person should really just take more levels in warlock.
|
| #4pukunuiAug 09, 2014 18:14:56 | I've been playing an alpha rogue/warlock for a while now, and my character doesn't feel screwed at all. |
| #5ClockworkNecktieAug 09, 2014 18:23:08 | Could you copy or summarize the warlock-specific stuff on multiclassing? Do they just count like a barbarian or something with regards to the multiclass spell slot table? |
| #6SturmunddrangAug 09, 2014 18:30:07 |
|
| #7souldoubtAug 09, 2014 18:37:32 |
|
| #8ClockworkNecktieAug 09, 2014 18:44:57 |
|
| #9Mephi1234Aug 09, 2014 19:16:09 |
|
| #10KalaniAug 09, 2014 19:45:43 | Warlock/noncasters will not feel screwed by the multiclassing rules.... Warlock/casters (esp. cleric, druid, sorcerer, or wizard) will feel screwed however.
The only advantage gained, is that warlock spells can be cast freely with caster slots, and vice versa. Primary Warlocks with a few levels in another casting class can take advantage of this, gaining the ability to cast 1st (and/or 2nd) level spells repeatedly. This is a negligable benefit however, once you factor in the reduced pact slots due to multiclassing, and their extremely limited number (2 slots for a large portion of their career), and the fact that these spells may use Wisdom or Intelligence as their caster stat.
Despite these slots recharging on a rest, single-class casters will likely have more castings of their low level spells than the multiclass warlock/caster.
Primary casters may gain a slight benefit in being able to cast warlock-only spells with their spell slots, however this would only offer true benefit to the Bard, Paladin, or Sorcerer (due to sharing a casting stat), in which case the warlock spells (and invocations) are effectively added to their class spell list.
I can understand their reason for not stacking the abilities - as it would result in a Wizard 4/Warlock 4 having 4/3/3/2 spell slots in addition to 2 4th level pact slots (more than any other spellcaster) - however they could have allowed them to stack at half levels, resulting in 4/3/3 and 2 3rd level spell slots (as a 6th level caster, and 6th level warlock respectively). |
| #11ElfcrusherAug 09, 2014 20:07:41 | Yeah, I think warlock/caster multiclasses get TONS of low-level spells, and no high level ones.
But...why would you want to multi-class like that?
I'm with the poster who wouldn't multiclass warlock with anything, but if I was thinking of good multiclasses it would be combining a Pact of the Blade lock with Assassin, or perhaps Vengeance Paladin. |
| #12KalaniAug 09, 2014 20:10:03 | I agree. Multiclassing warlock should only be done to gain the non-spellcasting features of the class, as their spellcasting side is shafted regardless of what you mc them with. Warlock is just one of those classes that doesnt play nice in the multiclass sandbox lol. |
| #13VeleriaAug 09, 2014 20:58:06 | Not all multiclasses will enhance the parent class. Multiclass is intended as a way to customize your character, not to min/max. I am Min/maxer myself but I can recognize that sometimes it just isn't meant to be.
|
| #14SturmunddrangAug 09, 2014 21:12:55 |
|
| #151eejitAug 09, 2014 22:02:01 | I can see some other classes taking 2 levels in warlock for invocations. Like ninja monk wanting devil's sight. |
| #16zagora_01Aug 09, 2014 22:38:20 |
My intention was to make a good mystic warrior. I was going to take 7 levels of Eldritch Knight to get War Magic. I was invisioning casting a 2 beam eldritch blast followed by a melee attack. After realizing that my caster level wouldn't go up and that I would have disatvantage on my Eldritch blasts, I realized it wasn't worth it Instead I'm going to take 2 levels of fighter for the duelist fighing style, and the action surge.
I agree though, the warlock is a powerful class. I like it. |
| #17KalaniAug 09, 2014 22:44:21 |
|
| (Reply to #17)Ashrym |
|
| #19VeleriaAug 09, 2014 23:02:15 | Why does every multiclass have to be a good option? |
| #20The_JesterAug 09, 2014 23:56:45 | I'm not sure how they could have worded it to make it work without having to greatly increase the multiclassing section of the rules for a single class. The warlock is the only class to get specific multiclassing rules.
There are some advantages, such as gaining access to far more spells that are not on the warlock list and being able to cast them at maximum efficiency every time. A one level dip in cleric will make the warlock into a pretty disgusting healer. |
| (Reply to #19)Xeviat-DM |
|
| #22zagora_01Aug 10, 2014 10:26:35 |
|
| (Reply to #19)zagora_01 |
|
| (Reply to #22)TheMattyLee |
|
| #25KalaniAug 10, 2014 10:57:09 |
|
| #26VeleriaAug 10, 2014 11:25:07 |
|
| #27zagora_01Aug 10, 2014 11:57:04 |
|
| (Reply to #26)Xeviat-DM |
|
| #29SturmunddrangAug 10, 2014 18:43:47 |
|
| #30PolarisAug 10, 2014 20:33:16 |
|
| #31Xeviat-DMAug 10, 2014 21:06:51 | Perhaps that's why the designers didn't make Warlock spellcasting scale through multiclassing? The warlock is more geared for At-Will and "Encounter" type casting? |
| #32kalilAug 10, 2014 22:16:00 | I dunno about you guys, but I think reverse dipping one level life cleric seems pretty powerful on a warlock. |
| #33PolarisAug 10, 2014 22:57:14 |
|
| #34KalaniAug 10, 2014 22:41:10 |
|
| #35TheMattyLeeAug 10, 2014 22:59:39 |
|
| #36FallingIcicleAug 11, 2014 1:33:25 | I'm starting to wonder why they didn't just give the warlock regular spellcasting. Their whole setup seems really weird. They get spell slots, but only a few of them, that are regained after a short rest. Despite having so few slots, they still get the same number of spells known as the sorcerer. Then they gave them a single 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th level spell, which are once per day. Then on top of all of that they have invocations. It all seems like a cluttered mess to me, especially since it screws up their compatibility with multiclassing. |
| #37masterfat78Aug 11, 2014 2:32:58 | They are a A/E/D class for 5th. Thats why they dont mesh when multiclassing with the other spellcasters. |
| #38KalaniAug 11, 2014 8:44:12 |
|
| #39MechatarrasqueAug 11, 2014 8:50:43 |
|
| (Reply to #38)Ashrym |
|
| #41KalaniAug 11, 2014 10:10:06 |
|
| #42ElfcrusherAug 11, 2014 10:24:13 | Personally, I'm not even going to allow multiclassing in the 5e campaign I'm starting unless the concept just isn't possible with straight classes.
And by 'concept' I don't mean, "Like class X, but with Plate Armor!" and such.
|
| #43LokironAug 11, 2014 10:29:12 | The warlock was in the same packet as the sorcerer.. |
| (Reply to #41)Ashrym |
|
| (Reply to #43)Ashrym |
|
| #46TheMattyLeeAug 11, 2014 13:07:52 |
|
| #47masterfat78Aug 11, 2014 13:28:44 | Honestly the warlock looks like it multiclasses with the bard and pally fairly well. Its stat is the same as a sorcerers as well so it could be a dipping class for the sorcerer also. After that it multiclasses with fighters, rogues, and barbarians ok as well, slightly less so for rangers. that leaves druids, clerics, and wizards where it becomes very MAD and dont multiclass very good at all. That seem fine with me. Three good, three average, and three bad multiclass combos sounds like the system is working. By the way how sick is a balckguard/warlock going to be once the DMG comes out. |
| #48OverpromisesAug 11, 2014 16:48:52 |
|
| (Reply to #15)CriticalBastard |
|