| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1RhralJan 27, 2015 16:29:09 | Hello everyone while I read that in "Ravenloft: Van Richten's Guide to Vampires" which the very last page states a rather troublesome and problematic rule about why you can't play as a Vampire, which this is not only restrictive but also boring to cast entirity of Vampires under the "antagonist race" which has genocidal over/undertones to it and of course there's claims that the book makes the Vampires more 'complex' but not making them playable characters defeats this entire purpose if so since if one turns into a vampire, it can be a oppertunity of having "Friendly Neighborhood Vampire" examples but by automatically turning in the character sheet and becoming NPCs makes this impossible.
Well, if there's games like "Vampire: The Masquerade/Reqiuem" that allows you to play as a Vampire, why can't Ravenloft?
I have two possible counter points that first of all "evil" can be a subjective term that just because you feed on blood doesn't mean it makes you automatically evil (especially if some Vampires have a certain 'moral code' which they only kill and suck dry ones in self defense while the non-combative/'innocient' ones, they only feed half of their blood leaving the victim anough blood to surivie or even sucking blood during sex as a form of sensational pleasure for both partners to enjoy (as the human, the sensation of the vampiric kiss and the blood being drained from them and as the vampire, the pleasurable sensation of sucking their blood)..since I think maybe I would rather prefer Vampires or rather it would be best to describe Vampires as "hendoistic" then 'evil' since then again, "hendoism" goes against the ascesiticism of what mainstream religions represent hence they deem vampires "evil" because they rerpesent everything ascestics reject...but then again, there's also those who enjoy inflicting harm for pleasure and amusement without any regard of the victim which is where the "evil" comes in or rather it's where sociopathy/pychopathy comes in as a worthy title of "antagonist"), and also I think Vampire themed games can be different which can be more about political infighting and 'suriving the night' or 'growing as a vampire lord/lady of the night' rather than standard "Hero" context. |
| #2LlenlleawgFeb 19, 2015 13:23:47 | Vampires in Ravenloft are understood to be the vampires of traditional lore. They are not a race. They are not just a different kind of being, or people in a particular state, who happen to take blood as food. (If you want that for Ravenloft, play a vampyre, rather than a vampire.) They are rather unholy mockeries of what was once living. To get into the proper Gothic spirit of what a horrible thing a vampire is, consider what happens to Lucy Westenra in Dracula when she is slain by the Count and becomes one of the Un-Dead:
|
| #3Cyber-DaveJul 11, 2015 21:54:44 | I hate to say it Llenlleawg, but you are sort of wrong. That is what vampire's can be in some Ravenloft campaigns. That is what some of the Ravenloft products suggested that vampires should be (Van Richten's Guide is a good example). That being said, the novel Vampire of the Mists introduced a protagonist elf vampire, Jander Sunstar, whose overall traits would have put him at home in an Ann Rice novel. I could have sworn there was a Ravenloft product that also gave rules for vampire PCs (though I can't remember which one anymore, so maybe I am wrong). In the end, what any individual table wants to do with vampires will depend on what sort of horror the table wants to run. If the table want to run a classic Gothic tale of haunting and survival in face of great Evil, allowing vampire PCs would be a mistake. If the group wants to run a new Gothic tale of haunting and and an attempt to remain human despite the depravity of one's own nature, a vampire PC could work. In neither case would I suggest the sort of "relative morals" the OP suggests. That doesn't really fit with the theme of Ravenloft or D&D. There are absolute alignments in D&D. Ravenloft punishes one for acts that are capital Evil. Being a vampire in a Ravenloft themed game is a curse. But, there is room for a story with a PC vampire in a Ravenloft game. Jander Sunstar is proof of that. The only question is whether the table wants to run that sort of story. |
| #4OrdoVeth23Jul 22, 2015 19:14:38 | Cyber-Dave - The Ravenloft product that covered playing as a vampire (as well as other undead) was Requiem: The Grim Harvest.
Libris Mortis also covered playing undead characters, but was a 3.5 product. On a side note, there's also Ghostwalk, which is a 3e product that covers playing as undead characters of the ethereal variety. |