Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 neilselden Jun 29, 2015 16:13:48	Hi, Does anyone else think that multiclassing should be included in the basic rules?   -Neil
#2 mrpopstar Jun 29, 2015 16:50:08	I don't think so, no.   I do wish there was a fifth class included in the basic rules, though.   I vote lore bard.
#3 Ath-kethin Jun 29, 2015 17:47:21	No. But then, I don't think multiclassing should be included in the full rules, either. I am not a fan of multiclassing (after 2nd Edition, at least), is the takeaway here. I think the space and word count could have been far better used on something else. But I am sure that there are parts of the game I like which others feel should have been cut, so there you have it.
#4 Illithidbix Jun 29, 2015 17:47:50	Nope.   They're a layer of compexity that isn't really suiting the point of the Basic Rules.   I rather like the fact they've stuck big labels with "Optional Rules" and "DM's permission". It's entirely redundant with the ethos of the groups I play in, but a good idea none the less.
#5 Rya.Reisender Jun 30, 2015 6:41:53	Nope, multiclassing is too complex for the basic rules.
#6 JackOfAllTirades Jun 30, 2015 13:26:27	The worst part about the Multiclassing rules is that they're actually far more complex (in play) than they look (in writing), which would make them a poor choice for inclusion in the basic rules, IMHO.
#7 Thoughts_My_Aim Jun 30, 2015 13:49:13	Put me down as another one for "no". There's plenty in the basic rules.
#8 Avross Jul 02, 2015 9:46:33	Personally, I'd like to see the Basic Rules become even more lightweight.   With the ease of finding things on the internet, I find that the real value of the Basic Rules is not for people who 'can't afford the book', but more for people who just want to 'keep it simple'.
#9 mrpopstar Jul 02, 2015 14:59:32	Avross wrote:
#10 alienux Jul 02, 2015 19:53:46	I agree with everyone else; multiclassing should be in the PHB, not the basic rules.
#11 Avross Jul 03, 2015 15:46:08	mrpopstar wrote: