Shadow Arts

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

p3ck

May 08, 2015 6:20:51

S h a d o w A r t s
"Starting when you choose this tradition at 3rd level, you can use your ki to duplicate the effects of certain spells. As an action, you can spend 2 ki points to cast darkness, darkvision, pass without trace, or silence, without providing material components. Additionally, you gain the minor illusion cantrip if you don’t already know it"

 

Does the cantrip also require Ki using this description? I say no for two reasons:

 

1) Why has the cantrip been singled out? Why not just say:

"Starting when you choose this tradition at 3rd level, you can use your ki to duplicate the effects of certain spells. As an action, you can spend 2 ki points to cast darkness, darkvision, pass without trace, silence, or Minor Illusion without providing material components." Done.

2) Cantrips can be cast at will, without using a spell slot. Cantrips don't expend a resource.

 

Discuss.

#2

jaelis

May 08, 2015 6:25:39

The general rules is that a cantrip can be cast at will if you know it... I had assumed that was the same for the shadow monk.

#3

Tempest_Stormwind

May 08, 2015 6:44:23
A high elf fighter or first gnome monk both just "know" their cantrips and can cast them at will. The same is true for a Shadow Arts monk; ki provides a resource similar to spell slots, but cantrips don't need spell slots.
#4

Mechatarrasque

May 08, 2015 7:32:55

I agree, the cantrip is ki-free.  If they meant it to cost ki, they would have put it in the first sentence.

#5

p3ck

May 08, 2015 7:41:56

Thanks all for confirmation.

#6

jaelis

May 08, 2015 8:22:54

So you could be a monk and get proficiency with Thieves' Tools, use them to open locks for the party. Wouldn't have to spend any points on that either, its ki-less entry.

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

(Reply to #6)

p3ck

jaelis wrote:
#8

Cutlass

May 10, 2015 23:21:42
Either that or you could just kick the door down.
#9

RulesJD

May 10, 2015 23:47:35

jaelis wrote:
#10

ModusPonens

May 12, 2015 10:27:08

p3ck wrote: