| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1daedelAug 09, 2014 13:07:42 | I am "surprised" to find out that surprise doesn't concede automatically advantage to the attack. I know that if the pc's go stealth and ambush their enemies those attacks gain advantage, but I am thinking about other situations in which the party surprises the enemies but are not hiidden. For example, they break a door because they know they are enemies unaware of them in the other room, or in the the middle of a diplomatic conversation one pc (or npc) suddendly draws a sword and attacks. Would you consider giving advantage under those circumstances? |
| #2AaronOfBarbariaAug 09, 2014 16:16:23 | No, I would not give out advantage in those circumstances. My reasons are thus:
|
| #3JarodethAug 09, 2014 22:57:58 | I'd rule completely the opposite with a resounding "yes". If someone truly is not expecting to be lept out upon that is EXACTLY the kind of pre-planning and intelligent play that should be rewarded with advantage. And a true advantage it is throughout the history of combat. |
| (Reply to #2)hallows1999 |
|
| #5ShermanAug 09, 2014 23:47:15 | I think the distinction you're looking for is "Surprised" vs. "Unawares". D&D has a long history of surprise meaning a group of orc guards playing knucklebones at their post and having a party smash down a door and rush them. That's a far cry from someone sneaking up and knifing an orc at the table where they go from rolling knucklebones to spurting blood. Unprepared to fight vs. completely caught off guard. It's a little subtle, but it's really a huge difference. |