| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #17he_professorOct 23, 2014 4:29:54 | I don't see anything in the spell description that bars you from casting this spell on yourself (you just have to wear both rings). If this is allowed, exactly what effect would it have on your taking damage?
You get the +1 bonus to AC and Saving Throws, and then you get Resistance to all damage. However, if you take damage, you take that damage again it would seem. Are both instances of damage halved? Do you take half of the halved damage the second time? I'm so confused, but I'm likely making it more complicated than it actually is.
What are your thoughts? Would you allow a Cleric in yoru campaign to cast this spell on herself? |
| #2Plaguescarred1Oct 23, 2014 5:29:21 | I don't think its intended to work on you as the spell creates a mystic connection between you and the target which ends if you become separated by more than 60 feet. I know i wouldn't allow it IMC. |
| #3melloredOct 23, 2014 5:49:31 | It looks RAW, though as plauge said, douptfully RAI.
But yes, you would take 1/2 damage * 2.
Thus if you take 10 damage, you take 5 + 5 = 10 damage. If you take 11 damgae, you take 5 (rounded down) + 5 (rounded down) damage = 10.
Note too that you would make 2 concentration saves at 1/2 the DC (minimum 10). So that's probably it's main feature. |
| #4TimboramaOct 23, 2014 5:37:45 | ...you're over thinking it.
Yes you can cast it on yourself, technically, but a DM may rule otherwise.
But if a DM does allow it, you get +1 AC and Saves, and when a bad guy rolls an odd amount of damage, you take 2 less than you normally would (since you round down and then double it). Kinda crummy for a 2nd-level spell, but at least it doesn't require concentration...?
Of note: If you have Resistance from another source, or Resistance to a certain type of damage and then take that damage, while this spell is active, that Resistance is basically negated. The rules say that whenever you have "double" Resistance you only count it once (instead of twice which would effectively halving then quartering your damage), then you take the second instance of damage. So, while this spell is active, you can never truly benefit from Resistance |
| #5melloredOct 23, 2014 6:02:21 | Hmm... If you have resistance to all damage, and take damage though the bond, is that damage halved?
i.e. your a cleric/bear barbarian. You put warding bond on the squshy wizard and then rage.
The wizard get's hit for 40 damage. He's resistant so he takes 20. Your resistant to all (but psycic), damage. Do you also take 20, or do you take 10? |
| (Reply to #5)Timborama |
|
| #7melloredOct 23, 2014 6:20:54 |
|
| #8paulstraitOct 23, 2014 6:52:56 |
|
| (Reply to #8)Timborama |
|
| (Reply to #7)7he_professor |
|
| (Reply to #7)Timborama |
|
| (Reply to #11)7he_professor |
|
| #13EmpactWBOct 23, 2014 10:47:55 |
|
| #14melloredOct 23, 2014 11:02:10 |
|
| #15TimboramaOct 23, 2014 11:25:36 | Still seems hokey. In the realm of "Wish+Simulacrum for infinite clones" sort of whacky.
But hey, something a DM should be aware of (and a player should CERTAINLY ask their DM how that interaction works!). Even if their weak argument is to prevent odd shenanigans! |
| #16NovacatOct 23, 2014 11:28:49 | I would not allow it in my game, and even if it were allowed, I wouldn't recommend it. It's a waste of a 2nd level spell. |
| #17melloredOct 23, 2014 11:59:27 |
|
| #18NovacatOct 23, 2014 12:08:29 |
|
| #19melloredOct 23, 2014 12:25:35 |
|
| #20NovacatOct 23, 2014 12:31:12 |
|
| #21melloredOct 23, 2014 12:45:11 |
|
| #22melloredOct 23, 2014 12:37:48 | Also, could a cleric cast warding bond on more then one creature at a time? |
| #23NovacatOct 23, 2014 12:43:31 |
|
| #24paulstraitOct 23, 2014 13:49:21 |
|
| #25paulstraitOct 23, 2014 13:54:40 |
|
| #26paulstraitOct 23, 2014 13:58:09 |
|
| #27NovacatOct 23, 2014 14:45:00 |
|
| #28paulstraitOct 23, 2014 14:51:07 |
|
| #29Plaguescarred1Oct 23, 2014 16:24:34 |
|
| #30NovacatOct 23, 2014 16:26:22 |
|
| #31Plaguescarred1Oct 23, 2014 17:01:00 |
|
| #32melloredOct 23, 2014 17:00:05 | No comment on what happens if the caster has resistance? |
| #33NovacatOct 23, 2014 17:06:39 |
|
| #34NovacatOct 23, 2014 17:07:42 |
|
| #35Plaguescarred1Oct 23, 2014 17:09:09 |
|
| #36melloredOct 23, 2014 17:12:51 |
|
| #37Plaguescarred1Oct 23, 2014 17:20:29 |
|
| #38Plaguescarred1Oct 23, 2014 17:28:02 |
|
| #39melloredOct 23, 2014 17:41:54 |
|
| #40Plaguescarred1Oct 23, 2014 17:51:58 |
|
| #41paulstraitOct 23, 2014 20:34:47 |
|
| (Reply to #39)7he_professor |
|
| #43melloredOct 24, 2014 5:18:03 |
|
| #44TimboramaOct 24, 2014 6:04:11 | Hey Mello, and OP! Idea: Store Warding bond in a ring of Spell storage. Use suggestion/dominate on BBEG. Have him take the ring from you, and cast it on whoever is the half-orc in the party (maybe giving the ring to the half-orc, too). Have the half-orc cast Warding Bond (via spell or Ring) on another person, maybe a half-orc (that isn't the Assassin). Have the Assassin, erm, assassinate one of the half-orcs so all three basically take a butt-load of damage. Half-orcs survive. ??? Profit.
Or, alternatively, you can have some fun with this combo with Mello's favorite spell, Magic Jar...Possess a bad guy, cast warding bond on other bad guy, assassinate yourself to have BOTH bad guys die, and you can make a save to have your soul return to your jar...No Ring of Spell Storing required!
(see, this is why I'd rather just nip this in the bud by saying the spells stack, even if they're not casting it
|
| #45melloredOct 24, 2014 6:17:17 |
|
| #46melloredOct 24, 2014 6:18:40 | Speaking of which...
If you use magic jar, cast warding bond, then leave the body, where would the damage go? How about if your familiar casts it? |
| #47Plaguescarred1Oct 24, 2014 11:55:28 | Got reply from Jeremy Crawford;
@Plaguescarred Q bout Warding Bond spell if target and cleric has resistance, is damage halved twice or only once?
FWIW I asked a follow up question as to wether it was one or two instance of damage. |
| #48paulstraitOct 24, 2014 13:02:59 |
|
| #49Plaguescarred1Oct 24, 2014 13:31:57 |
|
| #50paulstraitOct 24, 2014 13:41:51 | I dunno, I'm a little too wordy for twitter character limits I've found. Let's see what he says to your follow up. |
| #51Plaguescarred1Oct 24, 2014 17:49:16 | Ok Jeremy clarified;
@JeremyECrawford Ah, I misunderstood your original question. If the cleric has resistance, nothing in the rules says it doesn't work. |
| #52melloredOct 24, 2014 18:06:29 | still doesn't make it a good spell. |
| (Reply to #52)7he_professor |
|