| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1HorwathDec 24, 2014 7:11:37 | Simple question; Can wood elf try to hide in dim light/darkness with its mask of the wild if darkness/dim light is not from magical sources?
|
| #2Ganymede425Dec 24, 2014 8:49:51 |
|
| #3HorwathDec 24, 2014 9:59:12 | I was asking for darkness, as darkvision improves darkness to dim light.
So I would be in a cave or dungeon does that qualify?
darkness spell is out of the question as it is magical.
|
| (Reply to #3)Ganymede425 |
|
| #5ChrisCarlsonDec 24, 2014 12:19:17 | I would likely rule no to having it work off of just dim light/darkness. Just because the lack of light is a "natural" phemonenon, doesn't, to me at least, mean it falls within the intended ability description. At least not as I read it.
That'd be like saying a wild elf should be allowed to use Mask of the Wild to hide in and among buildings in a city, because said buildings are made of wood and stone (both natural materials). |
| #6NoctaemDec 24, 2014 15:18:53 | Mask of the Wild only applies to situations where you're trying to hide in Heavy Rain, Folliage and the like. If your in a cave, it doesn't match the situation you're describing. Also, the fact that a creature has darkvision makes no difference for a creature trying to hide in darkness. What it does mean is that the creature with darkvision can see you, which means you can't hide. Small nitpick but an important one. |
| #7Plaguescarred4Dec 25, 2014 2:39:48 | FYI Jeremy Crawford confirmed dim light from torch and lantern should not qualify;
@Khanyoudigit1 Mask of the Wild differs from Skulker. Restricts to natural light obscurity. Trouble adjudicating. Can you advise? Thanks! |
| #8NoctaemDec 25, 2014 5:08:46 |
|
| #9Plaguescarred4Dec 25, 2014 6:49:31 | I would assume an elf lightly obscured by moonlight or cave's luminescent fungi would qualify for Mask of the Wild. |
| #10HorwathDec 25, 2014 6:56:20 |
|