| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1nightdruidApr 04, 2005 8:41:50 | Hey everybody, mind if I have your attention please? Its ironic. As long as I've waited, I'm at a bit of a loss of words, so I'll make this somewhat brief. You know, you find the most *amazing* things by hanging out on certain forums. Take the Kenzer forum, the makers of Hackmaster, for example. It seems that in July, they are releasing a product entitled "Hackjammer". Interesting, no? ;) Not too much has been said about it, other than, in the words of one "whalejudge", it was "done by three freelancing fanboys utterly thrilled to hear its on the schedule." Strange how he'd know that, no? Almost as strange that I knew it was coming...for a couple of years. Funny thing, no? Perhaps there was reason why I was so busy last year? Coincidence, maybe? Anyways, you can read all the gory details at: http://www.kenzerco.com/forums/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=HMGeneral&Number=671682&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=all And what's more, this "nightdruid" on that board ;) somehow managed to somehow guilt Jolly Blackburn into posting the cover image to this strange new game. And it looks pretty damned sweet to me. http://homepage.mac.com/jollybgood/PhotoAlbum17.html Is it July yet? :D Adam Look for my coming on the seventh month of the fifth year. At dawn look to the world were the Trio (plus one) that is Untouchable reigns supreme |
| #2DragonhelmApr 04, 2005 13:48:39 | Looking forward to it, Night Druid! ![]() And really, I think Hackmaster is a good system for the setting. It'll be neat to see how much this works with classic Spelljammer. ![]() |
| #3jesterjeffApr 04, 2005 15:32:23 | now is hackmaster 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 3.5? I had no idea hackmaster even existed. |
| #4nightdruidApr 04, 2005 16:12:32 | now is hackmaster 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 3.5? I had no idea hackmaster even existed. Hackmaster is in its 4th edition now...;) Basically, back when WotC switched over to 3e, they had no further use of the AD&D rules, so essentually they licensed them off to Kenzer co, who made the game Hackmaster. In essence, Hackmaster is 1e rules with an adapted Skills & Powers build system for traits, flaws, & skills, and a lot of original rules mixed in. As part of the deal they have to add in elements of humor. It boils down to if you liked AD&D and like a good deal of humor in your game, HM probably will appeal to you. If you want AD&D books burned at the stake, then you would probably want to stick to 3e. The humor element is not necessary to play, but does turn some people off. |
| #5jesterjeffApr 04, 2005 18:29:03 | sweet, one of my players is a 2nd addition natural but can't run a decent 3rd, he wats to run and always runs humour...like a planescaping kender with trinkets from the 'real' world hidden within his bag of holding(supersoaker with holy water)) and so on...........this'd be perfect for him. |
| #6nightdruidApr 04, 2005 18:38:20 | sweet, one of my players is a 2nd addition natural but can't run a decent 3rd, he wats to run and always runs humour...like a planescaping kender with trinkets from the 'real' world hidden within his bag of holding(supersoaker with holy water)) and so on...........this'd be perfect for him. Sounds like it HM does stuff like that, somewhat like 1e used to, but taken up a notch or five. Its an enjoyable writing style, but like I said, it grates with some people like fingernails on a chalkboard. Just depends on taste ![]() |
| #7jesterjeffApr 04, 2005 18:43:47 | I'd never run in it, but by the gods, I'd milk it for every pun the setting's worth |
| #8jeleinenApr 04, 2005 23:23:02 | Interesting. Not a rules set I care for, but I'll buy this none the less. |
| #9DragonhelmApr 05, 2005 12:17:56 | Interesting. Not a rules set I care for, but I'll buy this none the less. I don't know if you're into Castles and Crusades or not, but it would be an easy transition. If not, then (as said above) milk it for all the setting info. |
| #10jeleinenApr 05, 2005 18:10:05 | I don't know if you're into Castles and Crusades or not, but it would be an easy transition. If not, then (as said above) milk it for all the setting info. Actually, C&C is something I had considered. Older D&D stuff appears to be easily adapted to it and it's a simple rules set. Of course I'd have to make a few rules tweaks, but it looks like it'll handle house rules pretty well. Since Mr. N. Druid appears to be involved with this, maybe we can get some more info from him. I'm curious to know how closely this cleaves to the original setting. What are the ship rules like? Will it offer alternate PC races such as Giff and Dracons? |
| #11nightdruidApr 05, 2005 18:30:04 | Actually, C&C is something I had considered. Older D&D stuff appears to be easily adapted to it and it's a simple rules set. Of course I'd have to make a few rules tweaks, but it looks like it'll handle house rules pretty well. Wish I could tell you, but I'm not at liberty to say at the moment. July can't come fast enough... ![]() |
| #12DragonhelmApr 05, 2005 20:36:36 | Actually, C&C is something I had considered. Older D&D stuff appears to be easily adapted to it and it's a simple rules set. Of course I'd have to make a few rules tweaks, but it looks like it'll handle house rules pretty well. The system lends itself well to adaptation from AD&D, and especially to house rules. It takes the best of all editions to make a streamlined system. |
| #13jeleinenApr 05, 2005 20:52:34 | The system lends itself well to adaptation from AD&D, and especially to house rules. I have the book and I like it in spite of the errors. I just haven't had much opportunity to use it. Maybe I should start up a PbP C&C Spelljammer game and give it a spin. |
| #14zombiegleemaxApr 29, 2005 18:39:20 | the gory details at: The link seems to have ceased functioning. What happened to the thread over there? |
| #15nightdruidApr 29, 2005 18:54:26 | The link seems to have ceased functioning. What happened to the thread over there? Hmmmm...probably because the thread grew to something like 15 pages. I think the View All function ceases to work on threads larger than 10 pages. |
| #16jeleinenMay 03, 2005 18:51:49 | I have the book and I like it in spite of the errors. I just haven't had much opportunity to use it. Maybe I should start up a PbP C&C Spelljammer game and give it a spin. If anyone's interested, I've gone ahead and done this: http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?t=188038 . Figured I might as well post a link, since this thread's been revived. |
| #17nightdruidMay 04, 2005 11:01:22 | If anyone's interested, I've gone ahead and done this: http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?t=188038 . Figured I might as well post a link, since this thread's been revived. Hmmmm, I don't have an RPG.net account, so what is the title of the thread you're trying to post? Is it the "Future of Hackmaster" thread, or some other thread? When I click the link, it wants me to sign into RPG.net and doesn't give me the option of skipping that. |
| #18jeleinenMay 04, 2005 15:37:47 | Hmmmm, I don't have an RPG.net account, so what is the title of the thread you're trying to post? Is it the "Future of Hackmaster" thread, or some other thread? When I click the link, it wants me to sign into RPG.net and doesn't give me the option of skipping that. A play by post game I mentioned thinking about doing earlier in the thread. Sorry for being a little off topic. |
| #19nightdruidMay 04, 2005 16:49:24 | A play by post game I mentioned thinking about doing earlier in the thread. Sorry for being a little off topic. No problem. I was just curious if there was a thread on RPG.net that I wasn't aware of, and since I don't visit that site often, that was likely. ![]() |