| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1ssjvegetatrunksJun 27, 2009 12:25:34 | Does it have two sheathes or something? |
| #2balmasJun 27, 2009 12:34:31 | I usually just imagine it in a cloth sheath. You put it in a regular longsword sheath at the bottom and then wrap the whole thing in a sheet of cloth. |
| #3NyarlathotepJun 27, 2009 12:36:55 | Very carefully. |
| #4ssjvegetatrunksJun 27, 2009 12:40:34 | But if you're using the "Quick Draw" feat from 3.5... I can't imagine it would be easy to sheathe that weapon and unsheathe another that quickly. |
| #5balmasJun 27, 2009 12:49:58 | Two longswords that fit together? I dunno. Maybe a case arrangement. |
| #6mrdoobieJun 27, 2009 13:46:46 | Does it have two sheathes or something? Maybe you can break it apart into two seperate longswords, and you put it together when you draw it to fight. Meh, it's a stupid weapon anyway. |
| #7mobar2008Jun 27, 2009 14:07:33 | Maybe you can break it apart into two seperate longswords, and you put it together when you draw it to fight. Not as simple as a double bladed lightsaber. ![]() |
| #8balmasJun 27, 2009 14:17:24 | I just thought of something. How does a brilliant energy weapon not fall out of its sheathe? It passes through nonliving materials, doesn't it? |
| #9ssjvegetatrunksJun 27, 2009 15:30:57 | I just thought of something. How does a brilliant energy weapon not fall out of its sheathe? It passes through nonliving materials, doesn't it? I suppose the sheath is made out of living flesh, then. |
| #10countesskathleenJun 27, 2009 16:24:19 | Sounds like the old monofilament-debate *shivers* Anyway a brilliant energy weapon only has its bussiness end pass through matter, the handle would probably rest easy in an appropriate sheath. As far as the two-bladed sword goes, you're likely to strap it to your back somehow similar to a greataxe or fullblade. |
| #11Mad_JackJun 27, 2009 19:26:03 | Same way as you "sheath" a claymore or fullblade. With minor differences, of course. With most averaged-sized or small blades, the sheath or scabbard covers the entire length of the blade. However, with most two-handed blades, the "sheath" is actually only a short folded flap of thick stiff leather with an open top, attached to a strap that sits crosswise on your back. The blade is "drawn" by lifting it just a little bit and them turning your wrist to slip it out of the covering and roll it around your shoulder to the front before lifting it up into position, rather than drawing it up and out of the scabbard. If you had a two-bladed sword, you'd have it in some sort of short holder like a claymore across your back, where you can reach back over your shoulder and yank it free without much trouble. Alternatively, you might have a "sheath"-shaped strip of leather attached to your back diagonally, with a very short scabbard-type bit on the lower end to hold one blade of the sword. Then, in the middle of your back would be a flap or some sort of hook or holder to rest the handle of the blade in, with some sort of separate short sheath that you could slide over the uppermost blade when you're travelling. Either way, rather than reaching back over the same shoulder that the blade extends up over as with a claymore, you reach back over the other shoulder to grasp the blade near the middle. |
| #12the_shamanJun 27, 2009 19:54:03 | Anyway a brilliant energy weapon only has its bussiness end pass through matter, the handle would probably rest easy in an appropriate sheath. Maybe the Brilliant energy property is activated, i.e. by word or thought? This would make it a regular blade when you don't need the BE property. As for a double sword, hmm... may be anything from two sheaths to a collapsible grip. I guess it depends on the design . |
| #13calronmoonflowerJun 27, 2009 22:35:16 | How about a design that allows it to fold in the middle and lock in place when straitened? |
| #14sallaJun 27, 2009 22:37:41 | I just thought of something. How does a brilliant energy weapon not fall out of its sheathe? It passes through nonliving materials, doesn't it? the blade is, the hilt isn't. The hilt stops at the top of the scabbard. |
| #15corvusdrakeJun 28, 2009 9:03:59 | I always envisioned a backfitting clip-and-lock mechanism, which would let a quick-drawing player reach behind them and twirl the blade into and out of the sheath. |
| #16tiwaztyrsfistJun 28, 2009 12:23:09 | It's quite easy actually. You don't sheath a Double Sword. Ever. You simply carry it ready in your hands at all times, or lean it against a tree/wall while you are sleeping/eating. Sure, it makes people nervous and makes riding a horse complicated, but on the other hand, your weapon is always at the ready. When you get ambushed, who's ready? You are. No problem |
| #17NerpherderJun 28, 2009 13:24:05 | It is slung over your back with the downward blade being sheathed like a Fullblade. The upper blade would have a normal sword sheath that would have a loop to "lock" it on. When the character draws the sword they reach over their shoulder and pull the sword over and out of the sheath, then release the "lock" to drop the what was top blade, and now the bottoms, sheath off it and you are ready to fight. -Nerp |
| #18vman3forceJun 29, 2009 23:02:53 | this very question may be the key reason behind why nobody in existance ever opted to mass manufacture this weapon. that and the fact that you end up chopping your hand off. dumb weapon. |
| #19fenrir7139Jun 29, 2009 23:11:59 | I think the "breaks apart and then re-attaches" or "folds up" ideas work best; the weapon does make very little sense, but, hey, it looks cool. Besides, who really cares that much about realism in a game named after a MYTHOLOGICAL CREATURE? |
| #20thellarenJun 29, 2009 23:17:16 | Weapons like this are why 3E had Gloves of Storing. |
| #21entropy_judgeJun 30, 2009 9:59:49 | this very question may be the key reason behind why nobody in existance ever opted to mass manufacture this weapon. that and the fact that you end up chopping your hand off. dumb weapon. Or the hands of the guys next to you. It's a decent weapon if you possess the skill and strength required to use it effectively, but it's not a weapon designed for mass-production. |
| #22_jayne_cobb_Jun 30, 2009 10:38:15 | You sheate it in your enemy's belly, same as every other sword. |
| #23AbdulAlhazredJun 30, 2009 13:53:05 | You don't, because it isn't any more possible to sheath it than it would be to swing it. There is no rational explanation of how it could be used as a weapon, so who needs one for how it can be stored? What I REALLY want to see someone try to do is imagine how you would swing a double axe or a double flail, lol. I can ALMOST imagine something similar to a double sword, almost... |